Law Cases | The Canadian Encyclopedia

Browse "Law Cases"

Displaying 1-15 of 53 results
  • Article

    Aid to (or of) the Civil Power

    Aid to (or of) the Civil Power, the calling out of military troops by the civil authorities to help maintain or restore public order.

    "https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/10022750263_777cc2f581_k.jpg" // resources/views/front/categories/view.blade.php
    
    https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/10022750263_777cc2f581_k.jpg Aid to (or of) the Civil Power
  • Macleans

    Air India Arrests

    This article was originally published in Maclean’s magazine on November 13, 2000. Partner content is not updated.

    "https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/Categories_Placeholders/Dreamstime/dreamstimeextralarge_3134337973.jpg" // resources/views/front/categories/view.blade.php
    
    https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/Categories_Placeholders/Dreamstime/dreamstimeextralarge_3134337973.jpg Air India Arrests
  • Macleans

    Air India Bombing Arrests

    The calls to Perviz Madon's North Vancouver home began at 9 a.m. on Friday with the first rumours. After more than 15 years, callers said, RCMP members were arresting suspects in the murder of her husband, Sam, and 328 other passengers and crew of Air India Flight 182.This article was originally published in Maclean's Magazine on November 6, 2000

    "https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/Categories_Placeholders/Dreamstime/dreamstimeextralarge_3134337973.jpg" // resources/views/front/categories/view.blade.php
    
    https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/Categories_Placeholders/Dreamstime/dreamstimeextralarge_3134337973.jpg Air India Bombing Arrests
  • Article

    Air India Flight 182 Bombing

    The bombing of an Air India flight from Toronto to Bombay on 23 June 1985 — killing all 329 people on board — remains Canada’s deadliest terrorist attack. A separate bomb blast the same day at Tokyo’s Narita Airport killed two baggage handlers. After a 15-year investigation into the largest mass murder in the country's history, two British Columbia Sikh separatists were charged with murder and conspiracy in both attacks. They were acquitted in 2005. A third accused, Inderjit Singh Reyat, was convicted of manslaughter for his role in building the two bombs.

    "https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/media/2a68e5f8-4b0a-448c-a0a4-b221b9c70bf0.jpg" // resources/views/front/categories/view.blade.php
    
    https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/media/2a68e5f8-4b0a-448c-a0a4-b221b9c70bf0.jpg Air India Flight 182 Bombing
  • Macleans

    Air India Trial Ends in Acquittal

    This article was originally published in Maclean’s magazine on March 28, 2005. Partner content is not updated."IN THE EARLY morning hours of June 23, 1985, two bomb-laden suitcases detonated half a world apart," began B.C. Supreme Court Justice Ian Bruce Josephson, reading a verdict that set two men free and left hundreds more shackled to a 20-year-old tragedy that now seems beyond hope of resolution.This article was originally published in Maclean's Magazine on March 28, 2005

    "https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/Categories_Placeholders/Dreamstime/dreamstimeextralarge_3134337973.jpg" // resources/views/front/categories/view.blade.php
    
    https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/Categories_Placeholders/Dreamstime/dreamstimeextralarge_3134337973.jpg Air India Trial Ends in Acquittal
  • Article

    Assisted Suicide in Canada

    Assisted suicide is the intentional termination of one’s life, assisted by someone who provides the means or knowledge, or both. (See also Suicide.) Between 1892 and 2016, assisted suicide was illegal in Canada under section 241(b) of the Criminal Code. In 2015, after decades of various legal challenges, the Supreme Court of Canada decided unanimously to allow physician-assisted suicide. In June 2016, the federal government passed the Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) Act, which established the eligibility criteria and procedural safeguards for medically assisted suicide. In March 2021, new legislation was passed that expanded eligibility for MAID. This article contains sensitive material that may not be suitable for all audiences.

    "https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/Categories_Placeholders/Dreamstime/dreamstimeextralarge_1507037041.jpg" // resources/views/front/categories/view.blade.php
    
    https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/Categories_Placeholders/Dreamstime/dreamstimeextralarge_1507037041.jpg Assisted Suicide in Canada
  • Article

    Bailiff

    Bailiff, sheriff's deputy employed for the execution of judgements (eg, seizure of judgement debtor's goods, repossession of chattels, and evictions); also, an officer of the court having custody of prisoners under arraignment.

    "https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/Categories_Placeholders/Dreamstime/dreamstimeextralarge_270514366.jpg" // resources/views/front/categories/view.blade.php
    
    https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/Categories_Placeholders/Dreamstime/dreamstimeextralarge_270514366.jpg Bailiff
  • Article

    Bedard Case

    R v. Bedard (1971) challenged section 12(1)(b) of the Indian Act, which concerns the rights of Status Indian women in Canada. The appellant in the case, Yvonne Bedard, took the federal government to court after losing her rights as a Status Indian because of her marriage to a Non-Status man. In 1973, before the Supreme Court of Canada, the Bedard case merged with AG v. Lavell, another case concerning gender discrimination (see Status of Women) in the Indian Act. Although Bedard ultimately lost her reinstatement claims, her case inspired future legal battles regarding women’s rights and the Indian Act, including Lovelace v. Canada (1981) (see Sandra Lovelace Nicholas) and the Descheneaux case (2015).

    "https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/Categories_Placeholders/Flickr/4892749341_a5c8b85f32---resized.jpg" // resources/views/front/categories/view.blade.php
    
    https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/Categories_Placeholders/Flickr/4892749341_a5c8b85f32---resized.jpg Bedard Case
  • Article

    Bloody Sunday

    Bloody Sunday was a violent confrontation between protesters and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and Vancouver police in Vancouver on Sunday 19 June 1938.

    "https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/media/5ba00723-deb8-4e3b-b0a0-79e9b85cb189.jpg" // resources/views/front/categories/view.blade.php
    
    https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/media/5ba00723-deb8-4e3b-b0a0-79e9b85cb189.jpg Bloody Sunday
  • Article

    British Columbia Provincial Police

    British Columbia Provincial Police had its origin in the police forces established in the colonies of Vancouver Island and British Columbia in 1858 to provide law and order following an influx of gold miners and settlers.

    "https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/10022750263_777cc2f581_k.jpg" // resources/views/front/categories/view.blade.php
    
    https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/10022750263_777cc2f581_k.jpg British Columbia Provincial Police
  • Macleans

    Canada's Anti-Terrorism Act to Be Reviewed

    This article was originally published in Maclean’s magazine on October 25, 2004. Partner content is not updated. IN THE FEVERED DAYS following Sept. 11, 2001, media reports that some of the hijackers had entered the U.S. from Canada briefly raised fears that a Canadian connection would be a big part of the story of America's worst terror attacks.

    "https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/10022750263_777cc2f581_k.jpg" // resources/views/front/categories/view.blade.php
    
    https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/10022750263_777cc2f581_k.jpg Canada's Anti-Terrorism Act to Be Reviewed
  • Article

    Crime

    Crime in modern societies can be defined officially as acts or omissions prohibited by law and punishable by sanctions. Although crime is sometimes viewed broadly as the equivalent of antisocial, immoral and sinful behaviour or as a violation of any important group standard, no act is legally a crime unless prohibited by law. Conceptions of crime vary widely from culture to culture; only treason (disloyalty to the group) and incest are condemned virtually universally, but they were not always treated as crimes.

    "https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/media/04ee78c9-5b54-46b2-aaaf-652538ef9ff1.jpg" // resources/views/front/categories/view.blade.php
    
    https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/media/04ee78c9-5b54-46b2-aaaf-652538ef9ff1.jpg Crime
  • Article

    Daniels Case

    On 14 April 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in Daniels v. Canada that the federal government, rather than provincial governments, holds the legal responsibility to legislate on issues related to Métis and Non-Status Indians. In a unanimous decision, the court found that Métis and Non-Status peoples are considered Indians under section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867 — a section that concerns the federal government’s exclusive legislative powers. Recognition as Indians under this section of law is not the same as Indian Status, which is defined by the Indian Act. Therefore, the Daniels decision does not grant Indian Status to Métis or Non-Status peoples. However, the ruling could result in new discussions, negotiations and possible litigation with the federal government over land claims and access to education, health programs and other government services.

    "https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/media/7ac02b0f-118b-4ccb-b6dc-81f218b68954.jpg" // resources/views/front/categories/view.blade.php
    
    https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/media/7ac02b0f-118b-4ccb-b6dc-81f218b68954.jpg Daniels Case
  • Article

    David Milgaard Case

    David Milgaard was a 16-year-old hippie when he was charged with the rape and murder of Saskatoon nurse Gail Miller in 1969. Milgaard's prosecution for first degree murder at age 17 became one of Canada's most notorious wrongful convictions. He was finally released in 1992 after 23 years in prison. DNA evidence exonerated him in 1997 and led to the conviction of Larry Fisher, a serial sex offender, in 1999. Milgaard received an official apology from the Saskatchewan government in 1997 and a $10 million settlement in 1999. Milgaard became an advocate for prison reform and the rights of the accused and helped establish a federal commission to investigate cases of alleged wrongful conviction. This article contains sensitive material that may not be suitable for all audiences.

    "https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/media/1e75a485-5d28-4c4e-afb8-304b1ba7795f.jpg" // resources/views/front/categories/view.blade.php
    
    https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/media/1e75a485-5d28-4c4e-afb8-304b1ba7795f.jpg David Milgaard Case
  • Article

    Delgamuukw Case

    The Delgamuukw case (1997) (also known as Delgamuukw v. British Columbia) concerned the definition, the content and the extent of Aboriginal title (i.e., ownership of traditional lands). The Supreme Court of Canada observed that Aboriginal title constituted an ancestral right protected by section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. Influenced by the Calder case (1973), the ruling in the Delgamuukw case had an impact on other court cases about Aboriginal rights and title, including in the Tsilhqot’in case (2014).

    "https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/Twitter_Cards/supreme court-1.jpg" // resources/views/front/categories/view.blade.php
    
    https://d2ttikhf7xbzbs.cloudfront.net/media/Twitter_Cards/supreme court-1.jpg Delgamuukw Case

Challenge yourself - take the CC Quiz!

The Canadian Encyclopedia is a project of Historica Canada, a non-profit, nonpartisan organization devoted to teaching Canadians more about our shared country.  We also produce the Heritage Minutes and other programs. If you believe all Canadians should have access to free, impartial, fact-checked, regularly updated information about Canada’s history and culture in both official languages, please consider donating today. All donations above $3 will receive a tax receipt.

Book a Speaker